20080523

gangstagrass

what does dobro, banjo, steel guitar, hillbilly yodeling, and fiddle have to do with urban beatz, gangsta rap and prodigious use of the n-word?

well not much if we are knowledgeable of the context and culture of appalachian bluegrass and urban gangstarap respectively. but if - while appreciating both - we can recognize these categories to be only arbitrary - the idea of any "real" or absolute walls between the two fall away. that is, while genres are not true - i think the music of gangstagrass is. (more on my take of arbitrary vs. true)

(download gangstagrass free - you might need a meal or two before it finishes downloading)

while it is important to appreciate the context, culture and story of genres (styles), i think there is a huge difference between (particularly the integrity of) recycling old ideas/formulas just because thats the way its always been done (or worse because it sells); and respecting the heritage and stories of the past, but creating something new with integrity that reflects your story, or a new story, or a new take on an old story.

(as a groove-challenged caucasian i can do those links better with bluegrass than i can with the gangsta / urban side of things).

while listening to gangstagrass - its is difficult to conjure up the circumstances by which this music would've emerged organically. there is a convergence of elements here that don't correlate to anything we know about (earth's) history: black urban america doesn't use acoustic instruments - and the downward spiral of urban decay and drum machine beatz has no meaning where there is little infrastructure.

still - after listening, we might begin to consider that a dobro can sound as badass as a drive by shooting... and we might start to think that rappers have a thing or two to learn from the machine gun timing of an olde timey auctioneer (track 15). and we might even begin to see commonalities in these respective stories: that the hard times in urban america and the hard times in rural appalachia are both born of pain and truth and expressed in sounds that resonate - with each other.

and thats the magic - i think - when an appreciation, mutual respect and a bridging happen.

so anway - i could be talkin about anything - but last night i was talkin with some friends about rethinking worship & arts & integrity & church & tradition & respecting historic christian modalities...

Labels: , , , , ,

20071212

multiple (arbitrary) disciplines

of all the comments received on our youtube video, two stood out to me above the rest:

FINALLY! Science meets the Indescribable Yahweh! Powerful video! I loved the famous Appolo 8 Genesis reading, the SOUND of thunder, the wolf howl.
BeautySavesWorld
and:

You did an awesome job on the Indescribable video! Your version far surpasses the rest...thank you. What makes you tick? I have a sense that you "get it" on a deeper level and that has made it possible for the Creator to bless you with TALENT... LOVE... etc. This is kinda rare so I just was wondering. Meltingearth is a good name too... Are you driven for some calling here in these times? Do you KNOW?
lightsender4u

i think both of these point at something important - and that is a multi-disciplinary approach to creating content. my introduction to this idea goes back to when my brother was finishing his undergrad work in English and was thinking about going right on for his PHD, but was told by his mentor to "go live first, so you have something to write about". so my brother became a fireman. think he has lived? i'm pretty damn sure he has.

video editing, like any other mode of content creation, doesn't exist as pure discipline. everything is video editing and video editing is everything. everything is philosophy, and everything is painting, and everything is art, and math and science and storytelling and sociology and worship. and this is where i think anyone who creates content; be that musician or mathematician, editor or physicist, painter or theologian - does so effectively and with meaning, only in the context of, and dependant upon, their proficiency / experience with many other things.

if a mathematician tells me that .999 repeating is equal-to (exactly the same-as) one... that has implication for how I think of infinity and God and myself. its a mathematical proof but its also an idea that has changed my mind and crosses into philosophy and theology and how i see the world.

if a theologian tells you God is love... how will you understand that?

Labels: , , , ,